data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b95e/1b95e0d534c7ab5d0903a0991cb5cc17a2faa141" alt="Gimp vs krita"
I was totally wrong! But Krita does have good vector support. I know I know, I totally had the opposite impression. Krita is primarily a raster graphics editing tool, which means that most of the editing changes the values of the pixels on the raster that makes up the image. I can't show my commercial archviz unfortunately, so I found some old university renders of highly unrealistic and unbuildable stuff. Filters, like colour tweaks (curves, saturation, etc).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50683/5068334437b5581dc90e26054b6005972b6b532e" alt="gimp vs krita gimp vs krita"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b0ad/6b0addec69410bff67fd3785b0c58272290589bc" alt="gimp vs krita gimp vs krita"
Krita started after the GIMP, and I tried it a little when it first started but my goodness now it's much more mature and gives off quite a polish that The GIMP just doesn't convey (well, to me, personally, at least).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efda5/efda5867310ca4697bda76934de06b9d0f353318" alt="gimp vs krita gimp vs krita"
One tool that I never played with was Krita. I'm very familiar with the Adobe suite, and also with The GIMP. I've done a lot of arch viz, both the 3D kind and the 2D image-collage kind. I recently checked out Krita after reading about their latest beta release:
Gimp vs krita software#
TL DR go and recommend Krita to those using Photoshop! If they've tried The GIMP and turned back, this may surprise them! This should be one of the links on the wiki for beginning their free software journey, as it's a nice easy win.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b95e/1b95e0d534c7ab5d0903a0991cb5cc17a2faa141" alt="Gimp vs krita"